🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest has ceased to be a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that those in power allow or withhold at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would dictate the timing and location protests can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already undermined this essential right: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement extensive additional powers, which international human rights organizations had condemned as "serious and undue restrictions" on civil liberties. Collectively, these progressive assaults on liberty have practically eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Using Atrocity to Rationalize Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by referring to last week's terrible antisemitic attack on a Manchester Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that duty but distorts it.

"If you can't draw the line at mass killing, you probably cannot establish limits at democratic principles," observed a prominent American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of protest and direct action against racial discrimination and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were advocating the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's actually happening: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have described as genocide. Its military actions have led the global justice body to issue legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

Western public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a total prohibition on arms sales to the nation, and approve the arrest of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government seems included in this effort. Government officials have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish heritage with the actions of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly challenged for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a point where law enforcement can propose that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "implicated" in alleged abuse experienced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have taken many thousands of lives. British political leaders and news organizations have hardly hidden the limited value they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest expressions of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a concerning boundary by banning Palestine Action, a non-violent, anti-genocide activist collective. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, primarily for holding signs against mass killing and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president described such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears fought, suffered and died to secure our liberties. We may eventually rue how easily we permitted them to be eroded.